Workers' Compensation Newsletter

Injured Worker Claims, Employers and Workers' Compensation Laws

Workplace injuries are usually followed by a Workers’ Compensation claim filed on behalf of the injured employee. However, in certain situations a lawsuit against the employer may be more appropriate and more rewarding for the injured worker.

The typical Workers’ Compensation scenario involves an employee suffering an injury while at work. The injured worker then makes a Workers’ Compensation claim, and depending on the state in which he resides, will receive the appropriate compensation to which he is entitled. Any lawsuit or civil action against the employer is prohibited, as the employer is protected under Workers’ Compensation statutes.

Can an Employee Sue the Employer Outside of Workers’ Compensation?

If an injured employee can substantiate his claim, he will be allowed to sue his employer directly, outside of Workers’ Compensation. Injured employees can bring a claim against their employers directly under the legal theory of intentional tort. An intentional tort in this circumstance is when the employer causes the employee to engage in an activity from which “harm is substantially certain to follow.”

If the employee can prove that his employer caused him to participate in an activity from which harm is substantially certain to follow, court action can be brought. Such suits are encouraged to promote workplace safety, and to deter employers from intentionally jeopardizing the wellbeing of their employees. Proving the employer intentionally caused an injury is often a difficult task.

Activities from Which “Harm is Substantially Certain to Follow?”

Examples of this type of circumstance include:

• An employer instructing an employee to do a job in the same manner and method that has previously caused injury
• An employer instructing an employee to enter an area that is noxious or poisonous without informing the employee or providing the proper safety measures for that environment
• An employer instructing an employee to operate machinery on which safety devices or safeguards had been removed

Again, proving such conduct on the part of an employer is a difficult task. Employees should also be aware that laws governing the situations in which a court action can be brought outside of Workers’ Compensation varies from state to state.

© 2023 NextClient.com, Inc. All rights reserved.

• Workers' Compensation Laws and Hearing Loss Claims
  Studies reveal that hearing loss results most often from exposure to hazardous noise and, less frequently, from exposure to agents such as solvents and metals. Noise-related hearing loss is 100% preventable, but, once acquired, is... Read more.
• Disability, Serious Health Condition, and Occupational Injury in Employment
  When employees become disabled, sick, or injured, there are a number of laws and programs that could potentially affect employers’ responsibilities in their treatment of those employees. The laws which could potentially apply... Read more.
• A Volunteer's Eligibility to Collect Workers' Compensation
  As a general proposition, states typically require employers to carry Workers’ Compensation insurance. The underlying rationale for such a requirement is to ensure that an injured employee is quickly compensated for medical bills... Read more.
• Physician's Report for Worker Illness and Injury
  Many states have laws that require health care providers to complete numerous forms in order to document treatment provided to patients and their subsequent progress. In Workers’ Compensation law, physicians are often required to... Read more.

• Arizona Judges Rule COVID-19 Can Fall Under Workers’ Comp
• City of Minneapolis approves another $1M in worker’s comp for police officers
• NJ Supreme Court Weighs Exceptions in Workers’ Comp Statute for Injuries During Commute
• The Cannabis Conundrum: How Federal Policy Hampers Workers’ Comp’s Reimbursement for Medical Use
• It’s Back to School Time: Injuries and Employment Problems at School